🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.